首页> 外文OA文献 >Gift Card Incentives and Non-Response Bias in a Survey of Vaccine Providers: The Role of Geographic and Demographic Factors
【2h】

Gift Card Incentives and Non-Response Bias in a Survey of Vaccine Providers: The Role of Geographic and Demographic Factors

机译:疫苗提供者调查中的礼品卡激励措施和无答复偏见:地理和人口因素的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study investigates the effects of non-response bias in a 2010 postal survey assessing experiences with H1N1 influenza vaccine administration among a diverse sample of providers (N = 765) in Washington state. Though we garnered a high response rate (80.9%) by using evidence-based survey design elements, including intensive follow-up and a gift card incentive from Target, non-response bias could exist if there were differences between respondents and non-respondents. We investigated differences between the two groups for seven variables: road distance to the nearest Target store, practice type, previous administration of vaccines, region, urbanicity, size of practice, and Vaccines for Children (VFC) program enrollment. We also examined the effect of non-response bias on survey estimates. Statistically significant differences between respondents and non-respondents were found for four variables: miles to the nearest Target store, type of medical practice, whether the practice routinely administered additional vaccines besides H1N1, and urbanicity. Practices were more likely to respond if they were from a small town or rural area (OR = 7.68, 95% CI = 1.44−40.88), were a non-traditional vaccine provider type (OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.06−4.08) or a pediatric provider type (OR = 4.03, 95% CI = 1.36−11.96), or administered additional vaccines besides H1N1 (OR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.03−3.15). Of particular interest, for each ten mile increase in road distance from the nearest Target store, the likelihood of provider response decreased (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.60−0.89). Of those variables associated with response, only small town or rural practice location was associated with a survey estimate of interest, suggesting that non-response bias had a minimal effect on survey estimates. These findings show that gift card incentives alongside survey design elements and follow-up can achieve high response rates. However, there is evidence that practices farther from the nearest place to redeem gift cards may be less likely to respond to the survey.
机译:这项研究调查了2010年邮政调查中无应答偏倚的影响,该调查评估了华盛顿州不同样本提供者(N = 765)中H1N1流感疫苗接种的经验。尽管我们通过使用循证调查设计元素(包括深入的随访和Target的礼品卡激励)获得了较高的答复率(80.9%),但是如果受访者与未受访者之间存在差异,则可能存在不答复偏见。我们针对两个变量调查了两组之间的差异:到最近的目标商店的道路距离,执业类型,以前的疫苗接种,区域,城市化程度,执业规模以及儿童疫苗(VFC)计划注册。我们还研究了无答复偏差对调查估计的影响。在四个变量中,发现受访者和非受访者之间的统计上显着差异:距离最近的目标商店的英里,医疗实践的类型,该实践是否常规注射除H1N1之外的其他疫苗以及城市化程度。如果是来自非传统疫苗提供者的类型,如果来自小城镇或农村地区(OR = 7.68,95%CI = 1.44-40.88),实践更有可能做出回应(OR = 2.08,95%CI = 1.06-4.08 )或小儿科医务人员类型(OR = 4.03,95%CI = 1.36-11.96),或除H1N1外还接种其他疫苗(OR = 1.80,95%CI = 1.03-3.15)。特别令人感兴趣的是,距离最近的目标商店的距离每增加10英里,提供商响应的可能性就会降低(OR = 0.73,95%CI = 0.60-0.89)。在与响应相关的那些变量中,只有小城镇或农村实践地点与感兴趣的调查估计相关,这表明无响应偏差对调查估计的影响最小。这些发现表明,礼品卡激励措施以及调查设计元素和后续措施可以实现较高的响应率。但是,有证据表明,距离最近的地方兑换礼品卡的做法不太可能对调查做出回应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号